What to Do When Your Asylum Case Leads to Removal Proceedings

Receiving a Notice to Appear (NTA) in immigration court after years of waiting for an asylum interview is one of the most stressful situations an asylum seeker can face. Being placed in removal proceedings does not mean your asylum case is over—it means your case is now being transferred from USCIS to the immigration court system, where an immigration judge will decide your claim. While this transition can feel devastating, especially after a decade-long wait, many asylum seekers successfully obtain protection through the immigration court process, often called "defensive asylum."

The shift from affirmative asylum (applying directly to USCIS) to defensive asylum (defending against removal in immigration court) fundamentally changes your legal strategy, timeline, and procedures. Understanding this transition is critical for protecting your rights and presenting the strongest possible case. The most important action you can take immediately is hiring an experienced immigration attorney who specializes in defensive asylum cases and is familiar with your local immigration court.

This article explains what happens when USCIS refers your asylum case to removal proceedings, the legal framework governing this process, your rights and options in immigration court, and practical steps to take right now to protect yourself and your family.

Why Does USCIS Refer Asylum Cases to Immigration Court?

USCIS refers asylum applications to immigration court (removal proceedings) when they determine an applicant is ineligible for asylum, has violated immigration status, or when they cannot approve the case but believe an immigration judge should make the final decision. This referral is governed by 8 CFR § 208.14(c), which outlines the circumstances under which USCIS will not grant asylum and will instead issue a Notice to Appear.

Common Reasons for Referral to Removal Proceedings

Several factors can trigger USCIS to refer your case to immigration court rather than granting or denying asylum directly:

Status-Related Issues:

• You fell out of lawful immigration status before or during the asylum process
• Your visa expired and you remained in the U.S. without authorization
• You entered the U.S. without inspection (though this alone doesn't bar asylum eligibility)
• USCIS believes you violated conditions of your nonimmigrant status

Case-Specific Concerns:

• USCIS found credibility issues with your testimony or evidence
• Your asylum claim doesn't meet the legal definition under INA § 208(b)(1)(B)(i)
• You failed to establish persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group
• Country conditions changed significantly during your long wait, potentially weakening your claim
• You have criminal convictions or security-related issues that require judicial review

Procedural Reasons:

• You missed your asylum interview without good cause
• You failed to provide requested evidence or documentation
• USCIS determined you filed frivolously (rare but serious)
• Administrative backlog management strategies (increasingly common with cases pending 5+ years)

The "Last In, First Out" Problem

Since 2018, USCIS has implemented a "Last In, First Out" (LIFO) scheduling policy for asylum interviews, prioritizing recently filed applications over older ones. This policy has created a situation where applicants who waited patiently for years—like your parents who waited 10 years—may face referral to immigration court simply because their cases are old, country conditions have changed, or documentation from years ago is no longer readily available.

According to USCIS policy, cases pending for extended periods may be referred to immigration court even when the underlying asylum claim has merit, simply because the agency wants immigration judges to make the final determination. This doesn't mean the case is weak—it means USCIS is declining to approve it administratively.

What Are Removal Proceedings and How Do They Work?

Removal proceedings are formal court hearings before an immigration judge where the government (represented by an ICE attorney) argues you should be removed from the United States, and you present defenses—including asylum—to remain lawfully in the country. This process is governed by INA § 240 and the regulations at 8 CFR § 1240, and it operates very differently from the affirmative asylum process with USCIS.

The Notice to Appear (NTA)

Your removal proceedings begin when you receive a Notice to Appear (Form I-862). This document is the charging document in immigration court and includes:

• Your biographical information
• Allegations about your immigration status or violations
• Charges of removability (which section of immigration law the government claims you violated)
• The date, time, and location of your first court hearing (Master Calendar Hearing)
• Information about your right to representation at your own expense

You must respond to the NTA and appear at all scheduled court hearings. Failing to appear results in an automatic removal order (in absentia removal) under INA § 240(b)(5)(A), which is extremely difficult to reopen.

Master Calendar Hearings vs. Individual Merits Hearings

Immigration court proceedings typically involve two types of hearings:

Master Calendar Hearings (MCH):

• Brief hearings (often 5-15 minutes) where multiple cases are scheduled together
• You confirm your identity and address with the court
• The judge explains your rights and the charges against you
• You indicate what relief from removal you're seeking (asylum, withholding, CAT)
• The judge sets deadlines for filing applications and evidence
• Future MCHs are scheduled to monitor case progress
• The judge eventually schedules your Individual Merits Hearing

Individual Merits Hearing (IMH):

• This is your full asylum trial, typically lasting 2-6 hours or longer
• You testify under oath about your asylum claim
• Your attorney presents evidence and witness testimony
• The ICE attorney may cross-examine you and present opposing evidence
• The immigration judge asks questions and reviews all evidence
• The judge issues a decision either orally at the hearing or in writing later

In Dallas Immigration Court, as of 2025, the backlog means Individual Merits Hearings are typically scheduled 3-5 years after the initial NTA is filed. This extended timeline, while frustrating, gives you substantial time to prepare a thorough case with legal representation.

Your Rights in Immigration Court

Under INA § 240(b)(4), you have specific rights in removal proceedings:

• Right to representation by an attorney at your own expense (the government doesn't provide free attorneys in immigration court)
• Right to examine evidence against you and present evidence on your behalf
• Right to cross-examine government witnesses
• Right to interpretation in your native language at no cost
• Right to appeal an adverse decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
• Right to apply for relief from removal, including asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

How Is Defensive Asylum Different from Affirmative Asylum?

Defensive asylum is the process of applying for asylum as a defense against removal in immigration court, while affirmative asylum is applying directly to USCIS when you're not in removal proceedings. Both processes can result in asylum protection, but the procedures, burden of proof, and strategic considerations differ significantly.

Key Differences Between Affirmative and Defensive Asylum

Decision-Maker:

• Affirmative: USCIS asylum officer (administrative process)
• Defensive: Immigration judge (judicial process with formal rules of evidence)

Government Opposition:

• Affirmative: No opposing attorney; asylum officer evaluates your claim
• Defensive: ICE trial attorney actively opposes your case and may cross-examine you

Burden of Proof:

• Both require you to prove asylum eligibility, but defensive asylum involves more formal evidentiary standards
• Immigration judges apply Federal Rules of Evidence principles more strictly
• Cross-examination can be more rigorous and adversarial

Timeline:

• Affirmative: Historically faster (though currently 5-10+ years due to backlogs)
• Defensive: Currently 3-5+ years in Dallas from NTA to Individual Merits Hearing

Additional Relief Options:

• Defensive asylum allows you to simultaneously apply for related protections that aren't available in affirmative proceedings
• You can request withholding of removal under INA § 241(b)(3) (higher burden of proof than asylum but no discretionary denial)
• You can request protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) per 8 CFR § 1208.16-18

Strategic Advantages of Defensive Asylum

While no one wants to be in removal proceedings, there are some strategic advantages:

More Formal Process:

• Immigration judges are bound by precedent and formal legal standards
• You can subpoena witnesses and documents
• You have formal discovery rights
• The process creates a detailed record for appeals

Additional Forms of Relief:

• Beyond asylum, you may qualify for cancellation of removal, adjustment of status through family, or other relief
• Immigration judges can consider multiple forms of relief in a single hearing

Appellate Rights:

• You can appeal an immigration judge's denial to the Board of Immigration Appeals
• You can then petition federal courts for review
• This creates multiple opportunities to present your case

Work Authorization:

• You remain eligible for employment authorization while your case is pending, just as with affirmative asylum
• Apply using Form I-765 with the (c)(8) category (pending asylum application)

What Forms of Protection Can You Seek in Immigration Court?

In removal proceedings, you can apply for multiple forms of protection simultaneously, including asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Each has different eligibility requirements and benefits, as outlined in 8 CFR § 1208.

Asylum Under INA § 208

Asylum remains your primary form of relief. To qualify, you must establish:

• You suffered past persecution OR have a well-founded fear of future persecution
• The persecution is based on your race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion (the five protected grounds)
• The persecution is inflicted by the government or by groups the government cannot or will not control
• You are not subject to mandatory bars (such as certain criminal convictions, persecution of others, or firm resettlement in another country)
• You filed within one year of arriving in the U.S., or qualify for an exception to the one-year filing deadline

Benefits of asylum approval:

• Legal status to remain in the U.S. indefinitely
• Work authorization
• Ability to travel with refugee travel documents
• Path to green card after one year (adjustment of status)
• Ability to petition for spouse and unmarried children under 21 to join you

Withholding of Removal Under INA § 241(b)(3)

Withholding of removal is a backup protection when asylum isn't available. The standard is higher—you must prove it's "more likely than not" (greater than 50% chance) that you would face persecution if returned to your country.

Key differences from asylum:

• Higher burden of proof: More likely than not (51%+) vs. well-founded fear (10%+ chance) for asylum
• Not discretionary: If you meet the standard, the judge must grant withholding (unlike asylum, which is discretionary)
• Limited benefits: You can remain in the U.S. and work, but you cannot get a green card through withholding, cannot travel easily, and cannot petition for family members
• Available even with certain bars: Some criminal convictions that bar asylum don't bar withholding

Protection Under the Convention Against Torture (CAT)

CAT protection under 8 CFR § 1208.16(c) is available if you can show it's more likely than not that you would be tortured by or with the acquiescence of government officials if returned to your country.

Key features of CAT protection:

• No nexus requirement: Unlike asylum, torture doesn't have to be based on a protected ground
• Available despite bars: Even serious criminals who are barred from asylum and withholding may qualify for CAT
• Two forms: Withholding of removal under CAT (preferred) or deferral of removal (if withholding is unavailable)
• Very limited benefits: You can remain in the U.S. and work, but face annual reviews, no path to green card, no family petitions, and restrictions on travel

Other Possible Forms of Relief

Depending on your circumstances, you may also qualify for:

• Cancellation of removal (if you've been in the U.S. for 10+ years, have qualifying relatives who are U.S. citizens or LPRs, and can show exceptional hardship)
• Adjustment of status through family relationships (if you have an immediate relative petition)
• Voluntary departure (allows you to leave on your own terms if you cannot win relief, avoiding a formal removal order)

What Should You Do Immediately After Receiving an NTA?

The moment you receive a Notice to Appear, you should hire an experienced immigration attorney who specializes in defensive asylum cases and is familiar with your local immigration court. Time is critical, and the actions you take in the first few weeks can significantly impact your case outcome.

Step 1: Hire Qualified Legal Representation

This is not optional—immigration court is adversarial litigation, and you need an attorney. According to studies, represented asylum seekers are 3-5 times more likely to win their cases than those without attorneys.

How to find a qualified Dallas immigration attorney:

• American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA): Search the lawyer directory at www.ailalawyer.com for Dallas attorneys with asylum experience
• Dallas Bar Association: Contact the immigration law section for referrals
• Pro bono programs: If you cannot afford an attorney, contact:
  • Catholic Charities Dallas Immigration Legal Services
  • Human Rights Initiative of North Texas
  • RAICES Texas (primarily South Texas but may have referrals)
  • CLINIC (Catholic Legal Immigration Network) at cliniclegal.org

What to look for in an attorney:

• Specific experience with defensive asylum cases (not just family-based immigration)
• Familiarity with Dallas Immigration Court and its judges
• Track record with cases from your country of origin
• Clear fee structure and payment plans (many attorneys offer payment arrangements)
• Responsive communication and willingness to explain the process

Warning about notarios: In the U.S., "notarios públicos" are NOT attorneys and cannot represent you in immigration court. Only licensed attorneys or accredited representatives from recognized organizations can represent you under 8 CFR § 1292.1.

Step 2: Attend All Court Hearings

Missing even one court hearing can result in an automatic removal order. Under INA § 240(b)(5)(A), if you fail to appear at a scheduled hearing without good cause, the immigration judge will order you removed in absentia.

Critical actions:

• Note the date, time, and location of your first Master Calendar Hearing on your NTA
• Set multiple reminders (phone, calendar, written notes)
• Arrive at least 30 minutes early to go through security
• Bring your NTA, photo ID, and any documents your attorney advises
• If you must miss a hearing due to emergency, contact the court immediately and file a motion to reschedule

Dallas Immigration Court Information:

• Address: 125 East John Carpenter Freeway, Irving, TX 75062
• Automated case information line: 1-800-898-7180 (use your Alien number from your NTA)
• Check your hearing dates regularly—they can change

Step 3: Preserve and Gather Evidence

Start collecting evidence for your asylum claim immediately. The burden of proof is on you, and comprehensive documentation is essential.

Evidence to gather:

Personal Documentation:

• Passport, birth certificate, national ID cards
• Evidence of your identity and nationality
• Family relationship documents (marriage certificates, children's birth certificates)
• Educational and employment records

Evidence of Persecution or Fear:

• Police reports, medical records, hospital records
• Photographs of injuries or property damage
• Threatening letters, messages, or communications
• Witness statements from people who can corroborate your story
• News articles about incidents you experienced or similar cases
• Membership cards or documents from political, religious, or social organizations

Country Conditions Evidence:

• U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
• Reports from Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, or similar organizations
• News articles about conditions in your country
• Expert declarations about your country's situation

Evidence of U.S. Ties:

• Proof of continuous presence in the U.S. (leases, utility bills, tax returns)
• Employment records and pay stubs
• Children's school records
• Community involvement (church membership, volunteer work)
• Letters of support from friends, employers, community members

Step 4: Maintain Your Work Authorization

If you have employment authorization based on your pending asylum application, keep it current. File Form I-765 renewals with USCIS at least 120 days before your current EAD expires.

Current processing times (2025):

• Form I-765 (EAD based on pending asylum): 3-6 months
• Filing fee: $410 (though some asylum-based EAD applications are fee-exempt)
• Category: (c)(8

About This Post

This analysis was inspired by a public discussion on Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/USCIS/comments/1thb92c/my_parents_waited_10_years_for_their_asylum/

Immigration law is complex and constantly evolving. While this post provides general information based on current law and policy, every situation is unique.

Schedule a consultation

---

This post provides general information and is not legal advice. Laws can change and your facts matter. To get advice for your situation, schedule a consultation with an attorney.

Schedule a consultation